Re: [rfc v2][rft (procfs, nto-procfs)] Fix signal bypass heuristic with software single-step

[Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>]

Hello all,


Thanks for thinking about nto :-) I haven't been able to be active
lately, but hope will come  back soon.


On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 15:22 -0400, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Pedro Alves wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 March 2011 20:11:49, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > This makes sense to me.  Thanks for thinking this through.
> >
> > The patch looked okay to me.
> 
> Thanks for your review and comments!
> 
> 
> I'd prefer if there were some way to test this on a profcs and a
> nto-procfs target before applying the patch, though ...
> 
> Joel, I was wondering if you still have some procfs-based machines
> (e.g. Solaris) where you could run a test?
> 
> Aleksandar, would it be possible for you to test the patch on a
> NTO machine?

[AR]
yes, but you'd have to give me some time. I am over my head with work on
immediate deliveries.

How urgent do you need it?

Thanks,

Aleksandar

> 
> The patch in question is here:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-03/msg01223.html
> 
> Thanks for your help!
> 
> Bye,
> Ulrich
> 
> --
>   Dr. Ulrich Weigand
>   GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
>   Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
> 
>