From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10610 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2011 17:34:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 10559 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Apr 2011 17:34:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,SPF_SOFTFAIL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate5.uk.ibm.com (HELO mtagate5.uk.ibm.com) (194.196.100.165) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:34:44 +0000 Received: from d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.129]) by mtagate5.uk.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p3QHYTiN000626 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:34:29 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p3QHZWJT1654810 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:35:32 +0100 Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p3QHYSai002334 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:34:29 -0600 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with SMTP id p3QHYR33002293; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:34:27 -0600 Message-Id: <201104261734.p3QHYR33002293@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:34:27 +0200 Subject: Re: [rfc v2][rft (procfs, nto-procfs)] Fix signal bypass heuristic with software single-step To: aristovski@qnx.com (Aleksandar Ristovski) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:34:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com (Pedro Alves), brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1302053790.16582.71.camel@qnxws7629> from "Aleksandar Ristovski" at Apr 05, 2011 09:36:30 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00484.txt.bz2 Aleksandar Ristovski wrote: > I tested your patch on self-hosted x86 Neutrino and it did not show any > regressions. Great! Thanks for your support. > BTW, can you incorporate this in your patch to remove compile issues: > > @@ -72,9 +72,11 @@ static ptid_t do_attach (ptid_t ptid); > > static int procfs_can_use_hw_breakpoint (int, int, int); > > -static int procfs_insert_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type); > +static int procfs_insert_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type, > + struct expression *); > > -static int procfs_remove_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type); > +static int procfs_remove_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type, > + struct expression *); > > static int procfs_stopped_by_watchpoint (void); Sure; I've checked this part in right away. Thanks, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com