Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFC: lazily call save_current_space_and_thread
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110305125239.GA31797@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3k4geslx2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 20:52:41 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> +  /* We lazily save the current program space.  Saving the current
> +     program space is reasonably expensive in the multi-inferior case,
> +     and in many situations we don't need to do it.  Comparing a
> +     cleanup against NULL is usually forbidden, but in this case we
> +     have already made a cleanup, so we know it is safe.  */
> +  struct cleanup *current_space_cleanup = NULL;
> +
[...]
> +      if (current_space_cleanup == NULL)
> +	current_space_cleanup = save_current_space_and_thread ();

save_current_space_and_thread - like any make_cleanup derivation - may return
NULL even for successfully pushed cleanup function.  For example inside
TRY_CATCH, due to its save_cleanups.

GDB does need more C++.


Thanks,
Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-05 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-04 19:52 Tom Tromey
2011-03-05 12:52 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2011-03-07 19:54   ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-08 17:14     ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-08 17:16       ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-08 17:23       ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-08 17:49         ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-08 17:56           ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-08 18:02             ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-08 18:15               ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-08 18:37                 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-08 20:01                 ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-08 23:02                   ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-10 20:09                 ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-08 19:54           ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-08 19:54             ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-09 14:43       ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110305125239.GA31797@host1.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox