Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: brobecker@adacore.com (Joel Brobecker)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rfc, testsuite] Standardize tests for HW watchpoint capabilities
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:07:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102211506.p1LF6pDE028834@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110217101834.GE15527@adacore.com> from "Joel Brobecker" at Feb 17, 2011 02:18:34 PM

Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > To fix these problems, I've added a couple of new skip_..._tests
> > procedures to lib/gdb.exp, and have updated all related test cases
> > to make use of those procedures instead of open-coding checks.
> 
> Generally speaking, I think this is the way to go (that's what we do
> in AdaCore's testsuite infrastructure [which does not use dejagnu]).
> 
> > The new procedures allow checking for:
> > 
> >  - skip_hw_breakpoint_tests: Guards tests of hardware breakpoints
> >  - skip_hw_watchpoint_tests: Guards tests of hardware watchpoints
> >  - skip_hw_watchpoint_multi_tests: Guards tests that require more
> >    than one hardware watchpoint to be active at the same time
> >  - skip_hw_watchpoint_access_tests: Guards tests that require
> >    read or access type hardware watchpoints
> [...]
> > Any comments?  I'm planning to commit this in a couple of days ...
> 
> I only skimmed the actual changes, and while spending a little more
> time checking the implementation of the routines above.  It looks
> fine to me. Nice improvement, IMO - thanks!

Thanks for the review!

I've checked this in now.

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


      reply	other threads:[~2011-02-21 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-17 10:18 Ulrich Weigand
2011-02-17 11:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-02-21 15:07   ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201102211506.p1LF6pDE028834@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox