From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: rearnsha@arm.com (Richard Earnshaw)
Cc: dan@codesourcery.com (Daniel Jacobowitz), gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rfa, v3] Fix software-watchpoint failures on ARM by adding epilogue detection
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010081326.o98DQrBJ027948@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286542864.29651.13.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> from "Richard Earnshaw" at Oct 08, 2010 02:01:04 PM
Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 18:12 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > 2010-10-07 Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
> > Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
> >
> > * arm-tdep.c (thumb_in_function_epilogue_p)
> > (arm_in_function_epilogue_p): New.
> > (arm_gdbarch_init): Install arm_in_function_epilogue_p as
> > gdbarch_in_function_epilogue_p callback.
> >
>
> This is OK. There are some sequences that could be generated that this
> can't handle, and I don't think we'd ever get a stack decrement in an
> epilogue sequence.
>
> An example I don't think your code can handle is stack adjustments that
> are not valid immediates for ADD SP, #n. So very large stack adjusts my
> fail. These sequences will load or create an immediate in a register
> (particularly on Thumb1) and then add that to SP.
Thanks for the review; I've checked the patch in now. We can always
go back and add more instructions later ...
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-08 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-22 19:20 [rfa] Fix software-watchpoint failures " Ulrich Weigand
2010-09-22 20:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-09-23 16:13 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-09-24 16:11 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-09-28 20:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-09-28 21:47 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-09-28 21:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-09-29 15:24 ` Richard Earnshaw
2010-10-07 16:12 ` [rfa, v3] Fix software-watchpoint failures on ARM " Ulrich Weigand
2010-10-08 13:01 ` Richard Earnshaw
2010-10-08 13:27 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2010-09-29 14:43 ` [rfa] Fix software-watchpoint failures " Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010081326.o98DQrBJ027948@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dan@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=rearnsha@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox