Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org,        tromey@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Forbid watchpoint on a constant value
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 00:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201006052120.01863.sergiodj@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100605143752.GA14558@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>

On Saturday 05 June 2010 11:37:52, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> The DWARF spec http://www.dwarfstd.org/doc/DWARF4-public-review.pdf contains
> neither LOC_BLOCK nor TYPE_CODE_FUNC.  But I have checked now TYPE_CODE_FUNC
> and LOC_BLOCK are IMO equivalent at least for the DWARF symbols in this case
> as being read in by dwarf2read.c.

The DWARF spec doesn't contain LOC_BLOCK nor TYPE_CODE_FUNC because they're
specific to GDB internals.  Instead of it, I took a look into GDB source
and found the related DWARF elements associated to LOC_BLOCK (I already
knew the TYPE_CODE_FUNC was used for routines, so I assumed it used
the DWARF elements to describe a routine).  Given that, I found that
LOC_BLOCK is used in the same situation as TYPE_CODE_FUNC, and that's why
I concluded that both are equivalent.

-- 
Sergio Durigan Junior
Red Hat


  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-06  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-18 17:36 Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-05-18 17:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-05-18 19:24   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-05-18 23:08 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-05-18 23:50   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-05-19 20:26     ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-05-20  6:21       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-05-20 15:50         ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-05-20 16:24           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-05-20 17:03             ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-05-20 17:06               ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-05-27 21:54             ` Tom Tromey
2010-05-20 23:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-05-20 23:31   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-05-20 23:55     ` Joel Brobecker
2010-05-21  0:09       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-05-21  7:05         ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-05-21  8:44   ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-05-21 21:43     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-05-21 22:20       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-05-29  0:04         ` Joel Brobecker
2010-06-04 13:54           ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-06-04 16:49             ` Tom Tromey
2010-06-05  5:35           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-06-05 14:38             ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-06-06  0:20               ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2010-06-15 17:30             ` Tom Tromey
2010-06-16 18:33               ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2010-06-16 18:36                 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-05-28  5:12     ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201006052120.01863.sergiodj@redhat.com \
    --to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox