Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [RFC] frame_id_inner check and -fsplit-stack
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:07:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091229190720.GE24363@adacore.com> (raw)

Ian Taylor just reported on the GDB IRC that the frame_id_inner
check in get_prev_frame_1 is making debugging difficult when
the program has been built with -fsplit-stack. This option
<<permits discontiguous stack segments. The stack segments are
just allocated using mmap, so there is no particular ordering>>.
As a result, if two frames are on different stack segments,
the ordering of the segments might be such that two valid frames
might be failing the frame_id_inner check.

Discussing with Ian, he indicated that it should be easy to produce
a section with magic name. This would allow us to determine that
the program uses split-stack and that the frame_id_inner may not
apply.

I can see the following options:

  1. do nothing (ahem);
  2. remove the check entirely; we currently apply it I think
     when the two frames are normal frames.  We already skip it
     when either frame is not normal.
  3. provide a user setting that allows the user to tell GDB
     that the program uses split stacks;
  4. skip the test when split stacks is detected.

I don't think we should really consider option (3) if we can indeed
easily detect split-stack. (1) seems a bit harsh. I am Ok with either
(2) or (4). It sounds like Ian is willing to make it easy for us to
detect split-stack, so I'd vote for (4).  Given that nearly all the code
we debug does not use split-stack, we can keep the frame_id_inner check
a while longer...

Thoughts?

-- 
Joel


             reply	other threads:[~2009-12-29 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-29 19:07 Joel Brobecker [this message]
2009-12-29 19:49 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-12-30  8:06   ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-12-30  8:58     ` Joel Brobecker
2009-12-30 13:45     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091229190720.GE24363@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox