From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix breakpoints in unloaded shared libraries
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091222194521.GA22089@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3637y7sjb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:49:44 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Jan> breakpoints after:
> Jan> warning: Temporarily disabling breakpoints for ...
> Jan> are currently not handled correctly and GDB does even crash (with
> Jan> -lmcheck).
>
> Jan> 2009-10-25 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Jan> gdb/
> Jan> * breakpoint.c (bpstat_stop_status): Check BL->SHLIB_DISABLED.
> Jan> (print_breakpoint_location): New comment. Check LOC->SHLIB_DISABLED.
> Jan> Check LOC validity before printing it. Use LOC instead of B->LOC.
> Jan> Swap the if conditionals order.
>
> This is ok. Thanks.
The original mail had also the second part:
# 2009-10-25 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
#
# gdb/testsuite/
# * gdb.base/unload.c (main): Change the UNLOADSHR parameter to 1.
# Replace the printf call of Y by provided "y-set-1" label. New block
# for the second shared library.
# * gdb.base/unload.exp: Compile also the second library, call
# gdb_load_shlibs also for it. Use now gdb_breakpoint.
# (single pending breakpoint info): Rename to ...
# (pending breakpoint info before run): ... this extended test.
# (libfile2, libname2, libsrcfile2, libsrc2)
# (lib_sl2): New variables.
# (exec_opts): Set also SHLIB_NAME2.
# (pending breakpoint info on first run at shrfunc1)
# (pending breakpoint info on second run at shrfunc1)
# (pending breakpoint info on second run at shrfunc2)
# (print y from libfile, print y from libfile2): New tests.
# * gdb.base/unloadshr.c (shrfunc1): Change the returned value.
# * gdb.base/unloadshr2.c: New.
Do I understand it correctly your approval is for the gdb/ part while the
gdb/testsuite/ part is still left pending for review some other day?
Thanks for the review,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-22 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-25 15:21 Jan Kratochvil
2009-12-22 18:49 ` Tom Tromey
2009-12-22 19:45 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2009-12-22 19:47 ` Tom Tromey
2009-12-23 22:26 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091222194521.GA22089@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox