Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch] Allow to disassemble line.
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091008162445.GC11440@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0910080916i5a2eb49an5f21f3b5c7fb96ef@mail.gmail.com>

> Does anybody have an opinion on whether the implementation should be
> changed to match the manual, or vice versa?

My 2 cents: I *think* the intention of this setting was to display
the next few instructions that are about to be executed.  That's the way
I personally would like this feature to work as I'd be able to identify
immediately which instruction is next.  So my vote goes towards updating
the manual to match the current implementation.

-- 
Joel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-08 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-02  0:50 Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-02  6:52 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-02 18:31   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-02 18:49     ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-02 15:17 ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-08 16:16 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-08 16:23   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-10-08 16:25     ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-08 16:52     ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-08 17:29       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-10-08 17:33         ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-16 23:07       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-16 23:11         ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-17  8:33           ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-10-17 15:50             ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-17 16:49               ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-10-17 17:08                 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-17 19:55                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-10-19 17:47         ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-19 18:09           ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-19 18:20             ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-19 18:30             ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-21  0:22               ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-21  4:07                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-10-21 18:06                   ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-21 18:16                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-10-21 17:24                 ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-19 18:49             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-10-19 19:40               ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-19 19:56                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-10-19 20:03                   ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-19 20:10                     ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-19 20:23                       ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-19 20:47                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-10-19 19:40               ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-10-19 19:55                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-10-20 16:04               ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-08 16:24   ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2009-10-08 17:16     ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091008162445.GC11440@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox