From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Add comment describing the target_gdbarch global
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090514191946.GH7292@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905141359.n4EDxiLA017473@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 943 bytes --]
> > 2009-05-06 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> >
> > * gdbarch.h (target_gdbarch): Add comment documenting this global.
>
> Oops, I didn't notice that you're changing gdbarch.h directly.
> This is a generated file; you should be changing gdbarch.sh
> instead and regnerate the header file ...
(head shaking) This is really a rookie mistake. I can't believe I wasn't
paying more attention. Sorry about that!!!
Fixed thusly:
2009-05-14 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
* gdbarch.sh: Add comment documenting the target_gdbarch global.
gdbarch.h does NOT need to be regenerated as the corresponding
change has already been made in a previous commit.
As explained in the ChangeLog, I reran gdbarch.sh, and it generated
the exact same files.
Checked in.
--
Joel
PS: I'll review your Ada patches tomorrow morning (it's getting
too late for me, now). But thanks much for sending them.
[-- Attachment #2: gdbarch.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1017 bytes --]
Index: gdbarch.sh
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbarch.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.487
diff -u -p -r1.487 gdbarch.sh
--- gdbarch.sh 30 Apr 2009 02:52:16 -0000 1.487
+++ gdbarch.sh 14 May 2009 19:13:43 -0000
@@ -850,6 +850,17 @@ struct displaced_step_closure;
struct core_regset_section;
extern struct gdbarch *current_gdbarch;
+
+/* The architecture associated with the connection to the target.
+
+ The architecture vector provides some information that is really
+ a property of the target: The layout of certain packets, for instance;
+ or the solib_ops vector. Etc. To differentiate architecture accesses
+ to per-target properties from per-thread/per-frame/per-objfile properties,
+ accesses to per-target properties should be made through target_gdbarch.
+
+ Eventually, when support for multiple targets is implemented in
+ GDB, this global should be made target-specific. */
extern struct gdbarch *target_gdbarch;
EOF
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-14 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-07 0:54 Joel Brobecker
2009-05-07 12:09 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-05-07 14:53 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-05-14 14:00 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-05-14 19:19 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090514191946.GH7292@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox