* target/build mismatch for DJGPP
@ 2009-04-12 18:24 Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-17 11:53 ` Ben Elliston
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2009-04-12 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: config-patches; +Cc: gdb-patches
On the DJGPP platform, we currently have:
$ sh ./config.guess
i386-pc-msdosdjgpp
But then the top-level config/mh-djgpp has this:
# Shorten the target alias so when it is used to set 'libsubdir'
# the name will work in both short and long filename environments.
ifeq ($(findstring -pc-msdosdjgpp,$(target_alias)),-pc-msdosdjgpp)
target_alias=djgpp
endif
This causes all the configure scripts in subdirectories to be invoked
with --target=djgpp. But
$ sh ./config.sub djgpp
i586-pc-msdosdjgpp
This mismatch between the host and the target causes GDB to build as a
cross-debugger, without native support for the djgpp target.
To resolve this, I propose the change below. I think assuming i586 as
the lowest common denominator is okay these days, even for DJGPP.
Thanks.
2009-04-12 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
* config.guess (pc:*:*:*): Return i586-pc-msdosdjgpp, for
consistency with config.sub.
--- config.guess.~1~ 2008-12-18 07:26:46.000000000 +0200
+++ config.guess 2009-04-11 18:42:45.875000000 +0300
@@ -1115,8 +1115,11 @@
pc:*:*:*)
# Left here for compatibility:
# uname -m prints for DJGPP always 'pc', but it prints nothing about
- # the processor, so we play safe by assuming i386.
- echo i386-pc-msdosdjgpp
+ # the processor, so we play safe by assuming i586.
+ # Note: whatever this is, it MUST be the same as what config.sub
+ # prints for the "djgpp" host, or else GDB configury will decide that
+ # this is a cross-build.
+ echo i586-pc-msdosdjgpp
exit ;;
Intel:Mach:3*:*)
echo i386-pc-mach3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: target/build mismatch for DJGPP
2009-04-12 18:24 target/build mismatch for DJGPP Eli Zaretskii
@ 2009-04-17 11:53 ` Ben Elliston
2009-04-17 15:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ben Elliston @ 2009-04-17 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: gdb-patches
Hi Eli
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 09:24:10PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> To resolve this, I propose the change below. I think assuming i586
> as the lowest common denominator is okay these days, even for DJGPP.
I agree that it is a pretty conservative change. I'll commit your
patch to the master copy. Thanks,
Ben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: target/build mismatch for DJGPP
2009-04-17 11:53 ` Ben Elliston
@ 2009-04-17 15:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2009-04-17 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Elliston; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:53:10 +1000
> From: Ben Elliston <bje@air.net.au>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> Hi Eli
>
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 09:24:10PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > To resolve this, I propose the change below. I think assuming i586
> > as the lowest common denominator is okay these days, even for DJGPP.
>
> I agree that it is a pretty conservative change. I'll commit your
> patch to the master copy. Thanks,
Thank you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-17 15:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-12 18:24 target/build mismatch for DJGPP Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-17 11:53 ` Ben Elliston
2009-04-17 15:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox