Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* target/build mismatch for DJGPP
@ 2009-04-12 18:24 Eli Zaretskii
  2009-04-17 11:53 ` Ben Elliston
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2009-04-12 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: config-patches; +Cc: gdb-patches

On the DJGPP platform, we currently have:

  $ sh ./config.guess
  i386-pc-msdosdjgpp

But then the top-level config/mh-djgpp has this:

  # Shorten the target alias so when it is used to set 'libsubdir'
  # the name will work in both short and long filename environments.
  ifeq ($(findstring -pc-msdosdjgpp,$(target_alias)),-pc-msdosdjgpp)
  target_alias=djgpp
  endif

This causes all the configure scripts in subdirectories to be invoked
with --target=djgpp.  But

  $ sh ./config.sub djgpp
  i586-pc-msdosdjgpp

This mismatch between the host and the target causes GDB to build as a
cross-debugger, without native support for the djgpp target.

To resolve this, I propose the change below.  I think assuming i586 as
the lowest common denominator is okay these days, even for DJGPP.

Thanks.

2009-04-12  Eli Zaretskii  <eliz@gnu.org>

	* config.guess (pc:*:*:*): Return i586-pc-msdosdjgpp, for
	consistency with config.sub.

--- config.guess.~1~	2008-12-18 07:26:46.000000000 +0200
+++ config.guess	2009-04-11 18:42:45.875000000 +0300
@@ -1115,8 +1115,11 @@
     pc:*:*:*)
 	# Left here for compatibility:
         # uname -m prints for DJGPP always 'pc', but it prints nothing about
-        # the processor, so we play safe by assuming i386.
-	echo i386-pc-msdosdjgpp
+        # the processor, so we play safe by assuming i586.
+	# Note: whatever this is, it MUST be the same as what config.sub
+	# prints for the "djgpp" host, or else GDB configury will decide that
+	# this is a cross-build.
+	echo i586-pc-msdosdjgpp
         exit ;;
     Intel:Mach:3*:*)
 	echo i386-pc-mach3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: target/build mismatch for DJGPP
  2009-04-12 18:24 target/build mismatch for DJGPP Eli Zaretskii
@ 2009-04-17 11:53 ` Ben Elliston
  2009-04-17 15:26   ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ben Elliston @ 2009-04-17 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: gdb-patches

Hi Eli

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 09:24:10PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> To resolve this, I propose the change below.  I think assuming i586
> as the lowest common denominator is okay these days, even for DJGPP.

I agree that it is a pretty conservative change.  I'll commit your
patch to the master copy.  Thanks,

Ben


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: target/build mismatch for DJGPP
  2009-04-17 11:53 ` Ben Elliston
@ 2009-04-17 15:26   ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2009-04-17 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ben Elliston; +Cc: gdb-patches

> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:53:10 +1000
> From: Ben Elliston <bje@air.net.au>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> Hi Eli
> 
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 09:24:10PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > To resolve this, I propose the change below.  I think assuming i586
> > as the lowest common denominator is okay these days, even for DJGPP.
> 
> I agree that it is a pretty conservative change.  I'll commit your
> patch to the master copy.  Thanks,

Thank you.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-17 15:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-12 18:24 target/build mismatch for DJGPP Eli Zaretskii
2009-04-17 11:53 ` Ben Elliston
2009-04-17 15:26   ` Eli Zaretskii

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox