From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>,
Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [0/2] Inspect extra signal information
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902032350.31711.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e394668d0902031518q1c5c0e3fo3cec5bfc6e509962@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 23:18:40, Doug Evans wrote:
> One can either read the struct info buffer returned by ptrace directly
> (as in the above "mumble = siginfo.si_signo;")
Right, this is something similar to what the kernel does
in its conversion routines for 32-bit userspace support.
> or one can use a
> constructed gdbarch siginfo type that maps directly to a struct
> siginfo buffer returned by ptrace and use that to access it. Then one
> could write a routine that given either of those (pick one), and a
> pointer to the desired siginfo type, and returns a new value in the
> desired type.
When connected to a 64-bit gdbserver that is debugging a 32-bit
inferior, how would gdb know that the binary blob that is coming out
of TARGET_OBJECT_SIGNAL_INFO has the 64-bit layout, and that it
needs to be converted? All gdbarchs that we have accessible tell us
about the inferior arch, which is 32-bit. gdb has no idea that the
gdbserver is running a 64-bit ptrace.
>
> With this gdbserver can continue to just pass the raw buffer back to
> gdb.
I don't see how given that missing link.
> Otherwise I guess you'd have to switch to passing back a
> semi-formatted buffer of values from gdbserver that gdb can then
> parse.
>
>
> Does that make sense?
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-03 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-12 18:47 Pedro Alves
2009-01-12 18:49 ` Pedro Alves
2009-01-12 18:52 ` [1/2] " Pedro Alves
2009-01-12 19:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-02-02 16:51 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-02 21:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-02-05 1:14 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-05 20:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-02-06 23:31 ` Pedro Alves
2009-01-12 18:50 ` [2/2] " Pedro Alves
2009-01-12 19:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-13 12:32 ` Pedro Alves
2009-01-13 18:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-13 19:08 ` Pedro Alves
2009-01-13 19:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-02-06 23:35 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-09 6:23 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-02-09 22:17 ` Pedro Alves
2009-04-06 19:00 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-04-06 19:18 ` relying on testsuite results Thiago Jung Bauermann
2009-04-06 19:33 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-04-06 19:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-04-06 19:51 ` Tom Tromey
2009-04-06 20:22 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-04-07 14:57 ` [2/2] Inspect extra signal information Pedro Alves
2009-01-12 23:27 ` [0/2] " Mark Kettenis
2009-01-13 11:05 ` Pedro Alves
2009-01-13 18:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-13 18:50 ` Pedro Alves
2009-01-13 19:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-13 19:37 ` Pedro Alves
2009-01-13 19:47 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-02 14:40 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-02 20:49 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-02-03 15:02 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-03 16:42 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-02-03 18:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-03 18:24 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-03 19:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-03 19:51 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-03 23:18 ` Doug Evans
2009-02-03 23:50 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2009-02-04 0:17 ` Doug Evans
2009-02-04 0:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-04 0:49 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-04 21:02 ` [3/2] Inspect extra signal information, handle amd64 bi-arch gdb Pedro Alves
2009-02-04 21:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-06 23:37 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-07 2:28 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-02-07 14:56 ` Pedro Alves
2009-02-07 16:14 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-02-04 22:07 ` Doug Evans
2009-02-03 18:23 ` [0/2] Inspect extra signal information Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902032350.31711.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox