From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [patch] Simplify breakpoint.c function parameters
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081207222253.GA6749@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 409 bytes --]
Hi,
the patch has no effect on the functionality but I find the simplified code
less magic to understand.
It fixes a small bug - update_watchpoint() for bp_watchpoint (software
watchpoint) created breakpoint locations bp_loc_hardware_watchpoint while it
should be bp_loc_other. But I am not aware of any (possibly negative) effect
it had.
No regressions on {x86_64,ia64}-unknown-linux-gnu.
Regards,
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: gdb-breakpoint-type-simplify.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3582 bytes --]
2008-12-07 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Fix loc_type of `bp_location's created by update_watchpoint.
* breakpoint.c (allocate_bp_location): Remove the bp_type parameter.
Replace bp_type by bpt->type. Update prototype. All callers updated.
(add_location_to_breakpoint): Remove the bp_type parameter.
Replace bp_type by b->type. All callers updated.
(set_breakpoint_location_function): Replace bptype by b->type.
--- gdb/breakpoint.c 7 Dec 2008 15:59:51 -0000 1.364
+++ gdb/breakpoint.c 7 Dec 2008 19:19:40 -0000
@@ -181,8 +181,7 @@ static int single_step_breakpoint_insert
static void free_bp_location (struct bp_location *loc);
-static struct bp_location *
-allocate_bp_location (struct breakpoint *bpt, enum bptype bp_type);
+static struct bp_location *allocate_bp_location (struct breakpoint *bpt);
static void update_global_location_list (int);
@@ -924,7 +923,7 @@ update_watchpoint (struct breakpoint *b,
else if (b->type == bp_access_watchpoint)
type = hw_access;
- loc = allocate_bp_location (b, bp_hardware_watchpoint);
+ loc = allocate_bp_location (b);
for (tmp = &(b->loc); *tmp != NULL; tmp = &((*tmp)->next))
;
*tmp = loc;
@@ -4013,7 +4044,7 @@ adjust_breakpoint_address (CORE_ADDR bpa
/* Allocate a struct bp_location. */
static struct bp_location *
-allocate_bp_location (struct breakpoint *bpt, enum bptype bp_type)
+allocate_bp_location (struct breakpoint *bpt)
{
struct bp_location *loc, *loc_p;
@@ -4025,7 +4056,7 @@ allocate_bp_location (struct breakpoint
loc->shlib_disabled = 0;
loc->enabled = 1;
- switch (bp_type)
+ switch (bpt->type)
{
case bp_breakpoint:
case bp_until:
@@ -4144,9 +4175,9 @@ set_breakpoint_location_function (struct
breakpoint may cause target_read_memory() to be called and we do
not want its scan of the location chain to find a breakpoint and
location that's only been partially initialized. */
- adjusted_address = adjust_breakpoint_address (sal.pc, bptype);
+ adjusted_address = adjust_breakpoint_address (sal.pc, b->type);
- b->loc = allocate_bp_location (b, bptype);
+ b->loc = allocate_bp_location (b);
b->loc->requested_address = sal.pc;
b->loc->address = adjusted_address;
@@ -4981,18 +5015,17 @@ mention (struct breakpoint *b)
\f
static struct bp_location *
-add_location_to_breakpoint (struct breakpoint *b, enum bptype bptype,
+add_location_to_breakpoint (struct breakpoint *b,
const struct symtab_and_line *sal)
{
struct bp_location *loc, **tmp;
- loc = allocate_bp_location (b, bptype);
+ loc = allocate_bp_location (b);
for (tmp = &(b->loc); *tmp != NULL; tmp = &((*tmp)->next))
;
*tmp = loc;
loc->requested_address = sal->pc;
- loc->address = adjust_breakpoint_address (loc->requested_address,
- bptype);
+ loc->address = adjust_breakpoint_address (loc->requested_address, b->type);
loc->section = sal->section;
set_breakpoint_location_function (loc);
@@ -5090,7 +5125,7 @@ create_breakpoint (struct symtabs_and_li
}
else
{
- loc = add_location_to_breakpoint (b, type, &sal);
+ loc = add_location_to_breakpoint (b, &sal);
}
if (bp_loc_is_permanent (loc))
@@ -7226,7 +7263,7 @@ update_breakpoint_locations (struct brea
for (i = 0; i < sals.nelts; ++i)
{
struct bp_location *new_loc =
- add_location_to_breakpoint (b, b->type, &(sals.sals[i]));
+ add_location_to_breakpoint (b, &(sals.sals[i]));
/* Reparse conditions, they might contain references to the
old symtab. */
next reply other threads:[~2008-12-07 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-07 22:24 Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2008-12-08 7:35 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-12-08 13:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2008-12-08 11:06 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081207222253.GA6749@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox