Re: [RFA] fix win32-nat failure

[Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>]

On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 04:54:09PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>On Thursday 02 October 2008 16:25:00, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:01:20PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>>OK.  Please check it in.
>>
>>Um.  Wait a minute.  You may be a global maintainer now but as far as I
>>understand the process that doesn't give you carte blanche to make
>>changes in win32-nat.c or other parts of the code which have
>>maintainers.
>
>I understand that.  I'm sorry for if it sounded I was bypassing the
>process.  I just considered that this was an uncontroversial change in
>the light of what was expected from the target, and that it almost
>didn't require any win32 expertise at all.
>
>>I've been following this discussion to see the outcome and I have no
>>problems with the fix but I don't want you to assume that you have the
>>blanket right to authorize changes to win32-nat.c unless I seem to be
>>unresponsive for some period of time.
>
>I didn't assume that.  Again, sorry if it sounded like so.  I was
>really trying to *avoid* giving you extra trouble, due to an obvious
>crash I myself introduced.  I'll certainly be more careful next time.

Ok.  Understood.  Sorry if the above came across harsh.  I was surprised
and should not responded in such a knee-jerk fashion.

Thank you for being responsive.  When I have time I will look into the
other problems that you noticed, too, unless you already have tracked
those down.

cgf