Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Fix MI/async testsuite
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 19:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805042138.02094.vladimir@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080504172234.GB18323@caradoc.them.org>

On Sunday 04 May 2008 21:22:34 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 01:14:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Why should we print ^running before we are ready for more input?
> > 
> > *running, yes, soon as the target starts running.  But ^running is the
> > result of the command and should show up when the command is done,
> > shouldn't it?
> 
> Duh, this is because of sync mode, right?  Anyway, it seems like "gdb
> accepts input after -exec-continue" and "gdb uses *running instead of
> ^running" should have the same condition, to avoid this weird output.

Well, ideally, ^running should not exist. When gdb is done with a command,
it should always print ^done, and since it's done with a command, print a
prompt. Unfortunately, right now ^running exists and does something fairly
strange:

- in sync mode, you get "^running" + "(gdb)" before even trying to resume
target
- in async mode you get "^running" + random output + "(gdb)"
- in async mode when running CLI command, you get "^running" + "^done"

This is a mess, but I don't think we should/can fix this mess without
going to MI3.

- Volodya


  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-04 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-04 13:40 Vladimir Prus
2008-05-04 17:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-04 17:22   ` Vladimir Prus
2008-05-04 17:29     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-04 17:37       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-04 19:02         ` Vladimir Prus [this message]
2008-05-04 20:05           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-05  9:15             ` Vladimir Prus
2008-06-05 16:38               ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200805042138.02094.vladimir@codesourcery.com \
    --to=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox