Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Fix MI/async testsuite
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 17:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805042048.21287.vladimir@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080504163321.GA17507@caradoc.them.org>

On Sunday 04 May 2008 20:33:21 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 04:18:14PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > 
> > My previous patches to add =thread-created have broken MI testsuite
> > in async mode, since in async mode, the order of output is somewhat
> > different and the output for -exec-run is:
> > 
> >   ^running
> >   =thread-created
> >   (gdb)
> > 
> > with =thread-creating going before prompt, while in sync mode 
> > (gdb) follows ^running immediately.
> 
> Is this syntax only recently allowed and not yet documented?  I built
> the current info docs from CVS and the grammar does not allow for
> RESULT-RECORD OUT-OF-BAND-RECORD (gdb) NL.

Guess this is because I did not update the grammar per earliner discussion.
We should have RESULT-RECORD, OUT-OF-BAND-RECORD and PROMPT be independent,
and allowed to appear in any order.

> =thread-created after *running makes lots of sense.  =thread-created
> after ^running is a little weird to me.  If ^running is the response
> to a command it ought to be followed by a prompt.

Per current grammar, yes. In principle, no -- prompt indicates that gdb
is ready to accept further input, and should be printed, naturally, when
gdb is ready to accept more input -- which is not necessary right after
printing "^running".

- Volodya




  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-04 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-04 13:40 Vladimir Prus
2008-05-04 17:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-04 17:22   ` Vladimir Prus [this message]
2008-05-04 17:29     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-04 17:37       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-04 19:02         ` Vladimir Prus
2008-05-04 20:05           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-05  9:15             ` Vladimir Prus
2008-06-05 16:38               ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200805042048.21287.vladimir@codesourcery.com \
    --to=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox