From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Fix MI/async testsuite
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 17:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805042048.21287.vladimir@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080504163321.GA17507@caradoc.them.org>
On Sunday 04 May 2008 20:33:21 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 04:18:14PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> >
> > My previous patches to add =thread-created have broken MI testsuite
> > in async mode, since in async mode, the order of output is somewhat
> > different and the output for -exec-run is:
> >
> > ^running
> > =thread-created
> > (gdb)
> >
> > with =thread-creating going before prompt, while in sync mode
> > (gdb) follows ^running immediately.
>
> Is this syntax only recently allowed and not yet documented? I built
> the current info docs from CVS and the grammar does not allow for
> RESULT-RECORD OUT-OF-BAND-RECORD (gdb) NL.
Guess this is because I did not update the grammar per earliner discussion.
We should have RESULT-RECORD, OUT-OF-BAND-RECORD and PROMPT be independent,
and allowed to appear in any order.
> =thread-created after *running makes lots of sense. =thread-created
> after ^running is a little weird to me. If ^running is the response
> to a command it ought to be followed by a prompt.
Per current grammar, yes. In principle, no -- prompt indicates that gdb
is ready to accept further input, and should be printed, naturally, when
gdb is ready to accept more input -- which is not necessary right after
printing "^running".
- Volodya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-04 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-04 13:40 Vladimir Prus
2008-05-04 17:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-04 17:22 ` Vladimir Prus [this message]
2008-05-04 17:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-04 17:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-04 19:02 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-05-04 20:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-05 9:15 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-06-05 16:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805042048.21287.vladimir@codesourcery.com \
--to=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox