Re: [RFA/RFC] Report the original location specification for a breakpoint.

[Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>]

On Thursday 17 April 2008 14:17:12 Nick Roberts wrote:
>  > > Isn't this going to affect more than MI?  I thought the text from
>  > > ui_out_field_string was displayed for console too, just without the
>  > > label.
>  > 
>  > I don't this so, but I'll check. We can always make this field output
>  > just for MI.
> 
> It's used by "info breakpoints".

What's "it" above?

Anyway, it appears that the field indeed gets output in CLI mode, so I'll
adjust my patch not to do that.

>  
>  > > This definitely needs documentation to go in.  I can't say this
>  > > enough.  Undocumented fields in the MI output might as well not exist.
> 
> There are already many other fields that aren't documented, e.g.,
> pending, what, cond, ignore etc.  In fact the MI output of -break-insert
> is very variable.

Are you volunteering to document that?

- Volodya