[PATCH, GDB6.8] Build error on MinGW with mips-elf target

[PATCH, GDB6.8] Build error on MinGW with mips-elf target

[Hans Kester]

These patches fix a build error with MinGW when building a mips-elf target.
Could someone commit them for me? Do I need to submit a seperate patch
for mainline?

Regards,

Hans Kester


Index: sim/ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/sim/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.98
diff -u -r1.98 ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2008-04-11  Hans Kester  <kester.hans@gmail.com>
+
+   * common/sim-signal.c: define SIGTRAP for _WIN32
+
 2008-02-05  DJ Delorie  <dj@redhat.com>

    * configure.ac (v850): V850 now has a testsuite.


Index: sim/common/sim-signal.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/sim/common/sim-signal.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 sim-signal.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
    to not think the process has died (so it can be debugged at the point of
    failure).  */

-#ifdef _MSC_VER
+#ifdef _WIN32
 #ifndef SIGTRAP
 #define SIGTRAP 5
 #endif

Re: [PATCH, GDB6.8] Build error on MinGW with mips-elf target

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:55:18AM +0200, Hans Kester wrote:
> These patches fix a build error with MinGW when building a mips-elf target.
> Could someone commit them for me? Do I need to submit a seperate patch
> for mainline?

I have checked this in.  It's gross, but matches the status quo and
adds no new grossness.  Mark Mitchell fixed up several of the
simulators to not rely on the host's SIGTRAP definition, but those
using sim/common have a little further to go.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Re: [PATCH, GDB6.8] Build error on MinGW with mips-elf target

[Hans Kester]

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> I have checked this in.  It's gross, but matches the status quo and
> adds no new grossness.  Mark Mitchell fixed up several of the
> simulators to not rely on the host's SIGTRAP definition, but those
> using sim/common have a little further to go.

So I noticed. Thanks for yor help.