From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19099 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2008 15:16:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 19089 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2008 15:16:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:16:21 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942A5983D9; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:16:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7716698119; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:16:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JlQPq-0005BU-Ql; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:16:18 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:51:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Hans Kester Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, GDB6.8] Build error on MinGW with mips-elf target Message-ID: <20080414151618.GA19573@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Hans Kester , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <93da74750804110155q1df0f453l3da707ad310d75f5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93da74750804110155q1df0f453l3da707ad310d75f5@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:55:18AM +0200, Hans Kester wrote: > These patches fix a build error with MinGW when building a mips-elf target. > Could someone commit them for me? Do I need to submit a seperate patch > for mainline? I have checked this in. It's gross, but matches the status quo and adds no new grossness. Mark Mitchell fixed up several of the simulators to not rely on the host's SIGTRAP definition, but those using sim/common have a little further to go. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery