From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: -var-update @
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804032209.53480.vladimir@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18415.3808.504498.834488@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
On Sunday 30 March 2008 07:54:08 Nick Roberts wrote:
> > So, we still don't know why the current code does not work? I think
> > we still get to figure out, to make sure that whatever bug there is
> > does not affect other cases.
>
> My patch didn't do the right thing (it always marked a floating variable
> object as changed) but it's along the right lines. How about this one?
This patch seem to go in the right direction. I'm somewhat surprised that
evaluating previous expression gets bogus value, as opposed to getting
value in the frame where varobj was originally created. Any ideas why is that?
Do you think you can write some test to go along this patch?
Thanks,
Volodya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-03 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-26 14:54 Vladimir Prus
2008-03-27 5:17 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-27 7:00 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-27 9:54 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-27 10:38 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-27 13:25 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-03-27 13:37 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-27 20:58 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-28 14:32 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-03-28 16:22 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-28 16:33 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-04-01 13:37 ` André Pönitz
2008-04-01 13:56 ` Marc Khouzam
2008-04-01 14:30 ` André Pönitz
2008-04-03 19:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-03 19:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-03 20:05 ` Michael Snyder
2008-03-29 5:16 ` Nick Roberts
2008-03-29 6:38 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-03-30 3:54 ` Nick Roberts
2008-04-03 18:55 ` Vladimir Prus [this message]
2008-04-03 21:30 ` Nick Roberts
2008-04-04 11:45 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-11 22:01 ` Vladimir Prus
2008-04-11 23:22 ` Nick Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804032209.53480.vladimir@codesourcery.com \
--to=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox