From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Clarify infrun variable naming.
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071205015208.GB12545@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3ve7ej5xb.fsf@codesourcery.com>
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 05:17:52PM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
> - We should rename trap_expected to stepped_over_breakpoint. The past
> tense 'stepped' suggests that we're talking about a step which has
> already happened (which is true by the time we reach
> handle_inferior_event).
Don't we set it before we've stepped over the breakpoint? I find this
a little confusing...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Clarify infrun variable naming.
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 02:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071205015208.GB12545@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20071205024700.FCAhC4TFq0bj2ieWVbxZyEND274jsgegzSgkwoXsoqs@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3ve7ej5xb.fsf@codesourcery.com>
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 05:17:52PM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
> - We should rename trap_expected to stepped_over_breakpoint. The past
> tense 'stepped' suggests that we're talking about a step which has
> already happened (which is true by the time we reach
> handle_inferior_event).
Don't we set it before we've stepped over the breakpoint? I find this
a little confusing...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-05 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-23 13:23 Vladimir Prus
2007-11-23 14:53 ` Pierre Muller
2007-11-23 15:22 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-23 15:41 ` Pierre Muller
2007-11-23 15:51 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-23 16:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-23 17:03 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-23 17:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-23 16:14 ` Pierre Muller
2007-12-05 1:18 ` Jim Blandy
2007-12-05 1:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2007-12-05 2:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-05 8:37 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-12-05 14:13 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-12-05 21:32 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071205015208.GB12545@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox