From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13067 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2007 01:52:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 13059 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Dec 2007 01:52:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:52:11 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD26B9833F; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 01:52:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7923598100; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 01:52:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IzjQm-0003QH-6p; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:52:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Clarify infrun variable naming. Message-ID: <20071205015208.GB12545@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200711231623.04823.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 05:17:52PM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote: > - We should rename trap_expected to stepped_over_breakpoint. The past > tense 'stepped' suggests that we're talking about a step which has > already happened (which is true by the time we reach > handle_inferior_event). Don't we set it before we've stepped over the breakpoint? I find this a little confusing... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13329 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2007 01:52:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 13321 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Dec 2007 01:52:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:52:11 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD26B9833F; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 01:52:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7923598100; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 01:52:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IzjQm-0003QH-6p; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:52:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 02:47:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Clarify infrun variable naming. Message-ID: <20071205015208.GB12545@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200711231623.04823.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20071205024700.FCAhC4TFq0bj2ieWVbxZyEND274jsgegzSgkwoXsoqs@z> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 05:17:52PM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote: > - We should rename trap_expected to stepped_over_breakpoint. The past > tense 'stepped' suggests that we're talking about a step which has > already happened (which is true by the time we reach > handle_inferior_event). Don't we set it before we've stepped over the breakpoint? I find this a little confusing... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery