From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: msnyder@sonic.net
Cc: Michael Snyder <Michael.Snyder@access-company.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [OB] Add cleanup, source.c
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070629113407.GA13561@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11470.12.7.175.2.1183080998.squirrel@webmail.sonic.net>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 06:36:38PM -0700, msnyder@sonic.net wrote:
> > No, that's not right. Cleanups are often discarded after a successful
> > operation, in order to not free something that would have been cleaned
> > up on error.
>
> Well, I'm pretty sure you're mistaken.
We're both right. Cleanups do get discarded, and cleanups that aren't
discarded are called at the top level. Every cleanup I've written
since I started working on GDB at 2001 has been freed locally rather
than at the top level, though. I think it's very confusing if the
cleanups are not locally paired.
From gdbint.texinfo:
Your function should explicitly do or discard the cleanups it
creates. Failing to do this leads to non-deterministic behavior since
the caller will arbitrarily do or discard your functions cleanups.
This need leads to two common cleanup styles.
> 3) By example: in the same module (source.c), three other functions
> call buildargv and make_cleanup_freeargv -- and none of them calls
> do_cleanups.
>
> So you're holding me to a higher standard than the preexisting code.
> ;-)
True. There are several functions that do though. Well, I'll stop
objecting now :-)
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-29 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-28 22:35 msnyder
2007-06-28 22:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-28 23:12 ` msnyder
[not found] ` <655C3D4066B7954481633935A40BB36F041427@ussunex02.svl.access-company.com>
2007-06-29 0:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-29 2:05 ` msnyder
2007-06-29 11:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2007-06-29 17:02 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-06-29 20:34 ` Michael Snyder
2007-06-30 10:19 ` Michael Snyder
2007-06-30 14:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-06-30 16:39 ` Michael Snyder
2007-06-30 16:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-30 18:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-07-03 18:13 ` Jim Blandy
2007-07-04 17:35 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070629113407.GA13561@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=Michael.Snyder@access-company.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=msnyder@sonic.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox