From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@lu.unisi.ch>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>,
bonzini@gnu.org, Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com>,
'Steve Ellcey' <sje@cup.hp.com>,
binutils@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org, newlib@sourceware.org,
aoliva@redhat.com, libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm
Subject: Re: Final(?) patch to update libtool in GCC and src trees
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070411085700.GA7406@iam.uni-bonn.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <461CA157.1020908@lu.unisi.ch>
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:50:31AM CEST:
>>> I would rewrite them at the very least as
>>>
>>> AC_PROG_AWK
>>> AC_PROG_CXX
>>>
>>> if test "${use_libtool}" = "yes"; then
>>> AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL
>>> AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
>>> fi
>> I think that should use AS_IF instead.
>
> Does AS_IF put required macros outside its expansion? That's a
> cool feature if it does.
Only with Autoconf 2.60 and newer.
> However, if this is the case, it is also a problem.
> AM_PROG_LIBTOOL used to expand its subparts via
> AC_REQUIRE, which would sort of undo the effect of
> the if statement.
Yes, I don't think it'll help here. But also I don't see why CXX should
come into play here at all, if not by an old 1.5.x libtool.m4 file that
is picked up by aclocal (without having tested anything, though).
Cheers,
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-11 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-10 18:25 Steve Ellcey
2007-04-10 18:42 ` Andrew Pinski
2007-04-10 20:04 ` Steve Ellcey
2007-04-10 20:02 ` Dave Korn
2007-04-10 20:07 ` Steve Ellcey
2007-04-10 20:58 ` Dave Korn
2007-04-11 1:13 ` Dave Korn
2007-04-11 7:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-11 8:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-04-11 8:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-11 8:57 ` Ralf Wildenhues [this message]
2007-04-11 8:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-11 9:23 ` Dave Korn
2007-04-11 9:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-11 10:00 ` Dave Korn
2007-04-11 10:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-11 21:41 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-04-12 10:42 ` Dave Korn
2007-04-11 2:38 ` Charles Wilson
2007-04-12 6:36 ` Charles Wilson
2007-04-12 7:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-12 15:13 ` Steve Ellcey
2007-04-12 18:02 ` Charles Wilson
2007-04-13 7:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-13 17:27 ` Steve Ellcey
2007-04-13 18:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-04-13 18:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-13 18:27 ` Steve Ellcey
2007-04-13 18:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-13 18:44 ` Steve Ellcey
2007-04-13 20:19 ` Charles Wilson
2007-04-13 18:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070411085700.GA7406@iam.uni-bonn.de \
--to=ralf.wildenhues@gmx.de \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=dave.korn@artimi.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm \
--cc=newlib@sourceware.org \
--cc=paolo.bonzini@lu.unisi.ch \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=sje@cup.hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox