From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: <sje@cup.hp.com>, <binutils@sourceware.org>,
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, <gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
<newlib@sourceware.org>
Cc: <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>, <aoliva@redhat.com>,
<bonzini@gnu.org>, <fxcoudert@gmail.com>,
<libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm>, <schwab@suse.de>
Subject: RE: Final(?) patch to update libtool in GCC and src trees
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <006501c77bab$1753a410$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704101825.LAA20541@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
On 10 April 2007 19:25, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> Here is what I hope is the final patch to update libtool in the GCC and
> src trees. I tested this on HPPA HP-UX, IA64 HP-UX, IA64 Linux, and
> X86_64 Linux. I did get a few more errors with the new libtool than the
> old.
> Other than that the testing looked good.
You don't mention any cygwin testing; did anyone else do any?
> Given these results is it OK to checkin the new libtool? I'd rather not
> wait to fix the objc problem because maintaining all these changes in
> both the GCC and src trees is a bit of a pain.
I appreciate the problem, but Cygwin can be a bit 'special' when it comes to
libtool; if it hasn't been done yet, can you possibly bear to hold off a bit
while I give it some hasty testing? (By 'a bit', I mean no more than say
'overnight'). Sorry to be a pain :-/
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-10 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-10 18:25 Steve Ellcey
2007-04-10 18:42 ` Andrew Pinski
2007-04-10 20:04 ` Steve Ellcey
2007-04-10 20:02 ` Dave Korn [this message]
2007-04-10 20:07 ` Steve Ellcey
2007-04-10 20:58 ` Dave Korn
2007-04-11 1:13 ` Dave Korn
2007-04-11 7:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-11 8:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-04-11 8:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-11 8:57 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2007-04-11 8:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-11 9:23 ` Dave Korn
2007-04-11 9:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-11 10:00 ` Dave Korn
2007-04-11 10:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-11 21:41 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-04-12 10:42 ` Dave Korn
2007-04-11 2:38 ` Charles Wilson
2007-04-12 6:36 ` Charles Wilson
2007-04-12 7:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-12 15:13 ` Steve Ellcey
2007-04-12 18:02 ` Charles Wilson
2007-04-13 7:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-13 17:27 ` Steve Ellcey
2007-04-13 18:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-04-13 18:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-13 18:27 ` Steve Ellcey
2007-04-13 18:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-04-13 18:44 ` Steve Ellcey
2007-04-13 20:19 ` Charles Wilson
2007-04-13 18:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='006501c77bab$1753a410$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM' \
--to=dave.korn@artimi.com \
--cc=Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=fxcoudert@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm \
--cc=newlib@sourceware.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=sje@cup.hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox