From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-48354-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21460 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2007 20:02:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 21426 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2007 20:02:28 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.artimi.com (HELO mail.artimi.com) (194.72.81.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:02:19 +0100
Received: from rainbow ([192.168.8.46]) by mail.artimi.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); 	 Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:01:56 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: <sje@cup.hp.com>, 	<binutils@sourceware.org>, 	<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	<gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	<newlib@sourceware.org>
Cc: <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>, 	<aoliva@redhat.com>, 	<bonzini@gnu.org>, 	<fxcoudert@gmail.com>, 	<libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm>, 	<schwab@suse.de>
References: <200704101825.LAA20541@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
Subject: RE: Final(?) patch to update libtool in GCC and src trees
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:02:00 -0000
Message-ID: <006501c77bab$1753a410$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <200704101825.LAA20541@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2

On 10 April 2007 19:25, Steve Ellcey wrote:

> Here is what I hope is the final patch to update libtool in the GCC and
> src trees.  I tested this on HPPA HP-UX, IA64 HP-UX, IA64 Linux, and
> X86_64 Linux.  I did get a few more errors with the new libtool than the
> old. 

> Other than that the testing looked good.

  You don't mention any cygwin testing; did anyone else do any?

> Given these results is it OK to checkin the new libtool?  I'd rather not
> wait to fix the objc problem because maintaining all these changes in
> both the GCC and src trees is a bit of a pain.

  I appreciate the problem, but Cygwin can be a bit 'special' when it comes to
libtool; if it hasn't been done yet, can you possibly bear to hold off a bit
while I give it some hasty testing?  (By 'a bit', I mean no more than say
'overnight').  Sorry to be a pain :-/


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....