From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>,
GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] gdbserver/server.c: Replace 2x strlen() by a variable
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061226153538.GB16188@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061221130517.GH3640@adacore.com>
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 05:05:17PM +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure GCC will optimize away the strlen("QPassSignals:") anyway,
> > so we really shouldn't try to obfuscate the code just to make it a bit
> > faster. So if optimization was the Markus' argument for making this
> > change I object to this change.
Mark is correct, at least for recent versions of GCC. strlen of a
constant string without embedded zeros is folded to sizeof the string
minus one.
> How about avoiding the string duplication? Do you object to that too?
> This change seems like a good idea to me - although I agree that the
> risks of inconsistency are very small...
If it makes the code harder to read, I do object. This, and similar
motifs with hardcoded lengths instead of duplicated strlens, are all
through that file. I was careful to keep the duplications close
together so that they are easily visually confirmed. I don't want to
have to hunt around for the code implementing a particular packet.
If it makes the code easier to read somehow, I don't object - I'd
have to see it.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-26 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-21 7:45 Markus Deuling
2006-12-21 11:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-12-21 11:48 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-12-21 12:47 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-12-21 13:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-12-26 15:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061226153538.GB16188@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=deuling@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox