Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] decimal float point patch based on libdecnumber: testcase
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 02:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060623023808.GA1781@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606230709340.2780@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:27:29AM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> That is because they have different precision/exponent. Number 
> 1234567890123456.dd have 16 digits, its coefficient is 1234567890123456, 
> and exponent is 0, so it won't print back with an exponent.  While in the 
> case of "1.2E10dd", the coefficient is 12, exponent is 9, so it will print 
> back with an exponent. And in exponent display mode, the coefficient will 
> be normalized, in this case, to 1.2; and exponent get to 10 respectively.
> 
> For "p 1200000000000000.dd", it will return 1200000000000000. It is 
> equal to but different than 1.2E+15.  Their precison is not the same.

So they map down to different bit patterns.  How bizarre.

> Do you mean that we need to output something more close to the fact. to 
> say, "Addition/Multiple of decimal floating point is not supported right 
> now".  or something other like this.  If you want, I can do that.

No, I think what's there is fine - but add a test or two for that error
message.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-23  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-21 21:03 Wu Zhou
2006-06-21 23:36 ` [RFC] decimal float point patch based on libdecnumber: gdb patch Wu Zhou
2006-06-22  3:27   ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-06-22 14:18     ` Wu Zhou
2006-07-12 20:39   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-06-22 20:25 ` [RFC] decimal float point patch based on libdecnumber: testcase Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-06-22 23:27   ` Wu Zhou
2006-06-23  2:38     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-06-23 18:39       ` Wu Zhou
2006-06-23 18:49         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-06-23 19:25           ` Wu Zhou
2006-06-23 19:51             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-07-11 15:35 Wu Zhou
2006-07-12 17:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060623023808.GA1781@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=woodzltc@cn.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox