Re: [PATCH] Fix spurious mi-basics.exp failures

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 06:57:33PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:02:37PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
> > > I can't think of exactly how the anchoring would have just anything
> > > related to these tests.  I'm just wondering, what fixed the 
> > > relative/absolute path problem?
> > 
> > My point is that before the anchoring, the "^done" pattern probably
> > matched "203^done" in the output.
> > 
> > They're still broken if you configure with a relative path, which you
> > can see from your output:
> 
> That sounds like a reasonable explanation.  I've always had to configure
> with an absolute path, or else these tests would fail.  However, since
> some time the tests fail even when configuring with an absolute path.
> The patch I'm proposing gets them back to passing in that case (with
> relative path they still fail).
> 
> Is the patch OK then?

Yes, it is.  Thanks a lot.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery