* Re: [RFA/rs6000-aix] software_single_step gdbarch method no longer set
[not found] ` <20051231060032.GA17641@nevyn.them.org>
@ 2006-02-07 20:03 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-02-09 17:55 ` Kevin Buettner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2006-02-07 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Hey Daniel,
I am just realizing that I never got around to answering you.
> I have not looked at the patch much (won't this year). However, if
> you're feeling especially motivated, we could sidestep this issue...
> there's a related cleanup I've been meaning to do for a long while.
>
> The software single step method in the gdbarch is always used if it is
> set. But, that doesn't make a lot of sense. The gdbarch method should
> mean "software single step is supported"; the predicate "software
> single step is required" should live in the target vector instead!
> It's a property of the target. e.g. MIPS GNU/Linux doesn't implement
> PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, but if you're connected to a kernel debugging
> session using a hardware ICE, then maybe you've really got hardware
> single step.
Makes sense, but ...
> It's unfortunately a little trickier than that since remote targets
> don't currently report whether using software singlestep is OK :-(
> So setting the default behavior may not be simple. I know gdbserver
> needs some adjustment here.
I don't have that much time in the forseeable future to work on this,
unfortunately. I would also like to work on some other cleanup
activities, including the procfs stuff (which I promised to Mark and
yet haven't had time to look at).
So I'd rather see if my proposal can go in for now.
Thanks,
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/rs6000-aix] software_single_step gdbarch method no longer set
2006-02-07 20:03 ` [RFA/rs6000-aix] software_single_step gdbarch method no longer set Joel Brobecker
@ 2006-02-09 17:55 ` Kevin Buettner
2006-02-09 18:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Buettner @ 2006-02-09 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:03:51 -0800
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
> Makes sense, but ...
>
> > It's unfortunately a little trickier than that since remote targets
> > don't currently report whether using software singlestep is OK :-(
> > So setting the default behavior may not be simple. I know gdbserver
> > needs some adjustment here.
>
> I don't have that much time in the forseeable future to work on this,
> unfortunately. I would also like to work on some other cleanup
> activities, including the procfs stuff (which I promised to Mark and
> yet haven't had time to look at).
>
> So I'd rather see if my proposal can go in for now.
I've just looked over your patch. It looks reasonable to me and I think
it should go in.
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/rs6000-aix] software_single_step gdbarch method no longer set
2006-02-09 17:55 ` Kevin Buettner
@ 2006-02-09 18:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2006-02-09 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:55:57AM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:03:51 -0800
> Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>
> > Makes sense, but ...
> >
> > > It's unfortunately a little trickier than that since remote targets
> > > don't currently report whether using software singlestep is OK :-(
> > > So setting the default behavior may not be simple. I know gdbserver
> > > needs some adjustment here.
> >
> > I don't have that much time in the forseeable future to work on this,
> > unfortunately. I would also like to work on some other cleanup
> > activities, including the procfs stuff (which I promised to Mark and
> > yet haven't had time to look at).
> >
> > So I'd rather see if my proposal can go in for now.
>
> I've just looked over your patch. It looks reasonable to me and I think
> it should go in.
I totally agree; apologies if my suggestion came across as an
objection. I just looked at the patch for the first time and
it looks totally fine.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/rs6000-aix] software_single_step gdbarch method no longer set
[not found] <20051231054133.GL4734@adacore.com>
[not found] ` <20051231060032.GA17641@nevyn.them.org>
@ 2006-02-10 20:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-02-12 7:46 ` Jim Blandy
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2006-02-10 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
> 2005-12-31 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
>
> * defs.h (gdb_osabi): New enum value GDB_OSABI_AIX.
> * osabi.c (gdb_osabi_name): Add name of new value GDB_OSABI_AIX.
> * rs6000-tdep.h: New file.
> * rs6000-tdep.c: Include "rs6000-tdep.h".
> (rs6000_gdbarch_init): Remove enabling of software single step.
> Will be done in the AIX-specific initialization routine.
> * rs6000-aix-tdep.c: New file.
> * config/powerpc/aix.mt (TDEPFILES): Add rs6000-aix-tdep.o.
> * Makefile.in (rs6000_tdep_h): New variable.
> (rs6000-tdep.o): Update dependencies.
> (rs6000-aix-tdep.o): New rule.
Thanks to Kevin and Daniel for the review.
I just checked the patch in.
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/rs6000-aix] software_single_step gdbarch method no longer set
[not found] <20051231054133.GL4734@adacore.com>
[not found] ` <20051231060032.GA17641@nevyn.them.org>
2006-02-10 20:57 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2006-02-12 7:46 ` Jim Blandy
2006-02-14 20:46 ` Joel Brobecker
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jim Blandy @ 2006-02-12 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches
In rs6000_aix_osabi_sniffer, is it really necessary to check whether
bfd_get_flavour (abfd) == bfd_target_xcoff_flavour? You've already
restricted the sniffer to bfd_target_xcoff_flavour when you called
gdbarch_register_osabi_sniffer, if I'm reading gdbarch_lookup_osabi
correctly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/rs6000-aix] software_single_step gdbarch method no longer set
2006-02-12 7:46 ` Jim Blandy
@ 2006-02-14 20:46 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2006-02-14 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Blandy; +Cc: gdb-patches
> In rs6000_aix_osabi_sniffer, is it really necessary to check whether
> bfd_get_flavour (abfd) == bfd_target_xcoff_flavour? You've already
> restricted the sniffer to bfd_target_xcoff_flavour when you called
> gdbarch_register_osabi_sniffer, if I'm reading gdbarch_lookup_osabi
> correctly.
You are very likely right. This is a good catch, I will test the
obvious patch asap.
Thanks!
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-14 20:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20051231054133.GL4734@adacore.com>
[not found] ` <20051231060032.GA17641@nevyn.them.org>
2006-02-07 20:03 ` [RFA/rs6000-aix] software_single_step gdbarch method no longer set Joel Brobecker
2006-02-09 17:55 ` Kevin Buettner
2006-02-09 18:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-10 20:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-02-12 7:46 ` Jim Blandy
2006-02-14 20:46 ` Joel Brobecker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox