From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] print arrays with indexes
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 07:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051004074134.GB8849@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051004070220.GZ8849@adacore.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1410 bytes --]
BTW, I forgot to mention a couple of things regarding:
> 2. More annoying, I just tried something else, which is to print an
> empty Ada array. Ada allows you to create this by using declarations
> such as this:
>
> Table : array (1 .. 0) of Integer;
>
> Basically, if the lower/left bound is greater than the right/higher
> bound, then the array is empty.
>
> I just discovered that ada_val_print_1 calls val_print_array_elements
> even if the array is empty. This triggers one of the guards in
> get_array_low_bound(), since the function expects a non-empty array.
>
> I'm happy to just put a check in the Ada part to avoid calling
> val_print_array_elements for empty arrays. This should be fine, but
> I'm wondering if other languages might be doing the same, in which
> case it's probably going to be safer to modify a bit
> val_print_array_elements to handle empty arrays...
a. I tried with a C example, something like this:
int table [] = {};
And verified that GDB worked correctly (printed the address
of the array, but no value). So there is no issue with C,
at least. Don't have a pascal compiler handy, though.
b. I prefer the second approach. It just feels safer and more elegant.
In fact I just finished testing the attached patch. I will submit
a proper patch together with a testcase tomorrow.
--
Joel
[-- Attachment #2: valprint.c.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1225 bytes --]
Index: valprint.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/valprint.c,v
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -u -p -r1.55 valprint.c
--- valprint.c 3 Oct 2005 21:21:20 -0000 1.55
+++ valprint.c 4 Oct 2005 07:40:59 -0000
@@ -959,19 +959,21 @@ val_print_array_elements (struct type *t
unsigned int rep1;
/* Number of repetitions we have detected so far. */
unsigned int reps;
- long low_bound_index;
-
- if (!get_array_low_bound (type, &low_bound_index))
- {
- warning ("unable to get low bound of array, using zero as default");
- low_bound_index = 0;
- }
+ long low_bound_index = 0;
elttype = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (type);
eltlen = TYPE_LENGTH (check_typedef (elttype));
len = TYPE_LENGTH (type) / eltlen;
index_type = TYPE_INDEX_TYPE (type);
+ /* Get the array low bound. This only makes sense if the array
+ has one or more element in it. */
+ if (len > 0 && !get_array_low_bound (type, &low_bound_index))
+ {
+ warning ("unable to get low bound of array, using zero as default");
+ low_bound_index = 0;
+ }
+
annotate_array_section_begin (i, elttype);
for (; i < len && things_printed < print_max; i++)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-04 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-06 20:20 [RFC/RFA] " Joel Brobecker
2005-09-06 20:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-07 5:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-09-07 13:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-07 20:24 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-09-14 17:13 ` [RFA] " Joel Brobecker
2005-09-17 20:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-17 21:51 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-09-17 22:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-18 3:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-09-18 3:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-18 5:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-09-18 19:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-09-18 19:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-18 20:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-09-20 7:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-09-20 19:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-09-20 19:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-09-20 19:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-20 19:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-09-21 3:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-09-22 16:47 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-09-26 1:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-27 1:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-10-02 22:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 6:17 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-10-03 15:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-10-03 21:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-10-04 7:02 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-10-04 7:41 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2005-09-21 3:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-09-18 8:53 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-09-18 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-09-07 20:39 ` [RFC/RFA] " Jim Blandy
2005-09-07 21:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2005-09-09 19:14 ` Jim Blandy
2005-09-06 21:45 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051004074134.GB8849@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox