Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Faylor <me@cgf.cx>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: MinGW readline -- revised
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050725003930.GA31264@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050724211016.GA798@nevyn.them.org>

On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 05:10:16PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>These look fine; the changes aren't quite the way I'd have liked them,
>but if they've been taken for readline 5.1, it's important that we
>minimize divergence.  Chris, do these parts look OK to you?

*** readline/input.c    8 Dec 2002 22:31:37 -0000       1.5
--- readline/input.c    18 Jul 2005 23:59:21 -0000
*************** rl_getc (stream)
*** 422,431 ****
--- 422,438 ----
    int result;
    unsigned char c;

    while (1)
      {
+ #ifdef __MINGW32__
+       /* On Windows, use a special routine to read a single  character
+        from the console.  (Otherwise, no characters are available
+        until the user hits the return key.)  */
+       if (isatty (fileno (stream)))
+       return getch ();
+ #endif
        result = read (fileno (stream), &c, sizeof (unsigned char));

        if (result == sizeof (unsigned char))
        return (c);


This doesn't look right.  Shouldn't there be an ifdef there?  It's a
minor point but it looks like this would potentially produce dead code.

Other than that I have no objections other than to add an obligatory
grumble about the need to use a getch windows-ism.

cgf


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-07-25  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-19  0:11 Mark Mitchell
2005-07-22  7:29 ` Kai Henningsen
2005-07-24 21:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-24 22:50   ` Mark Mitchell
2005-07-24 23:00     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-24 23:03       ` Mark Mitchell
2005-07-25  0:39   ` Christopher Faylor [this message]
2005-07-25  0:41     ` Mark Mitchell
2005-07-25  0:41     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-25 14:54       ` Christopher Faylor
2005-07-25 14:55         ` Mark Mitchell
2005-07-25 15:01           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-25 15:02             ` Mark Mitchell
2005-07-25 15:10             ` Mark Mitchell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050725003930.GA31264@trixie.casa.cgf.cx \
    --to=me@cgf.cx \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox