From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] -data-list-changed-registers (Take 2)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 03:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050617032234.GG17013@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17074.16470.814479.200726@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 03:15:34PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
> > The only reason I haven't approved the gdb-mi.el you last posted was
> > because it depended on the MI patch which you just reminded me to look
> > at (which was an interface change, and I hadn't had a chance to
> > digest it yet). I do not want you to commit anything which uses MI
> > interfaces that don't exist yet! Normally, I'd be perfectly willing to
> > rubber-stamp it in.
>
> I'm thinking more generally. In Emacs, I commit about one change a week. If
> I need approval, then I will group changes together and do it less often, but
> someone is always available to approve those changes then there is no problem.
Let's hold this thought for a little bit. It may make sense for you to
commit these without approval in the future, once we've found our
stride again.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-17 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-01 11:12 [PATCH] -data-list-changed-registers Nick Roberts
2005-06-03 19:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-03 22:35 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-03 22:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-04 11:41 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-06 20:44 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-11 5:54 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-11 6:50 ` [PATCH] -data-list-changed-registers (Take 2) Nick Roberts
2005-06-13 2:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-13 4:47 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-13 13:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-13 22:38 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-13 22:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-14 2:45 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-17 1:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-17 3:13 ` Nick Roberts
2005-06-17 3:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050617032234.GG17013@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox