Re: [PATCH] -data-list-changed-registers (Take 2)

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 02:46:06PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
>  > > I get many failures on the testsuite, I'll try to move to a newer
>  > > PC/kernel.  mi-regs.exp seems OK though.
>  > 
>  > What failures, in particular?
> 
> I don't think you'll want to know, I think a lot of them are kernel
> related (2.4.19-16mdk).  I've attached the results below of a run with a
> newer kernel (2.6.9.1-1.667 Fedora Core 3)

These results are sane.  FYI, if you use a full path to run configure,
the mi-basics failures will go away.

> I've made more changes to gdb-mi.el now (it use -data-list-changed-registers
> now, for a start).  Since resources do seem to be stretched, and this is
> separate code that can't break GDB, could I be given authority to check in
> changes to this just this one file i.e. in MAINTAINERS:
> 
> Core: Generic components used by all of GDB
> ...
> gdb-mi.el               nickrob@snap.net.nz 
> 
> I did suggest this once to Andrew, but it never got resolved.  It might need
> an emergency general meeting and you might have to dust off a copy of the
> Constitution, but in reality its no big deal.  I've been doing something like
> this for Emacs for a couple of years now without problems.

The only reason I haven't approved the gdb-mi.el you last posted was
because it depended on the MI patch which you just reminded me to look
at (which was an interface change, and I hadn't had a chance to
digest it yet).  I do not want you to commit anything which uses MI
interfaces that don't exist yet!  Normally, I'd be perfectly willing to
rubber-stamp it in.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC