Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Question: Checking register value in buffer
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 03:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050519030704.GA30535@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050519022256.GA8204@redhat.com>

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:22:56PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:04:44PM +1000, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> >         LONGEST rav = extract_signed_integer (buf, 8)
> > 
> > and then do the test using integer arithmetics. But then I'm not guarantied
> > that LONGEST is at least 64bit long, am I.
> 
> It had better be, or the rest of alpha_next_pc is broken too.
> 
> Since it isn't, or isn't reported to be, you might as well 
> assume it is large enough.
> 
> > How are these sort of checks usually done in GDB?
> 
> In gcc-land we have a "need_64bit_hwint" bit in config.gcc, and it
> is set for targets that require the equivalent of LONGEST be at 
> least 64 bits, or we error out of configure.
> 
> Dunno what's done in gdb.

Because GDB doesn't have the same performance concerns with LONGEST
that GCC does with H_W_I, it's the biggest thing we can find.  Joel,
the definitions in defs.h are pretty clear - it will only be smaller
than 64-bit if we're really strapped for a 64-bit type, and if that's
the case, there's no way you're loading 64-bit ELF files.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-19  3:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-19  2:49 Joel Brobecker
2005-05-19  3:03 ` Richard Henderson
2005-05-19  3:07   ` Joel Brobecker
2005-05-19  3:23     ` Richard Henderson
2005-05-19  3:33       ` Joel Brobecker
2005-05-19  4:52         ` Richard Henderson
2005-05-19  5:37         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-19  3:26   ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-05-19 16:41 ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050519030704.GA30535@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox