From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] update gdb.base/shreloc.exp to use new shared library infrastructure
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050427155733.GB8399@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200504191731.06753.pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 04:31:06PM -0800, Paul Gilliam wrote:
> On Thursday 14 April 2005 12:23, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:13:36AM -0800, Paul Gilliam wrote:
> > > This patch updates gdb.base/shreloc.exp to use the new shared library infrastructure in
> > > lib/gdb.exp. All the stuff that has been cut from shlib-call.exp is now part of 'gdb-compile'
> > > or 'gdb-compile-shlib' (new) in lib/gdb.exp.
> > >
> > > This patch depends on the shared infrastructure patch:
> > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-04/msg00096.html
> >
> > Waitasec...
> >
> > > ! set additional_flags "additional_flags=-shared"
> > > !
> > > ! if {([istarget "*pc-cygwin"] || [istarget "*pc-mingw32"]) } {
> > > ! set additional_flags "${additional_flags} -Wl,--image-base,0x04000000"
> > > }
> >
> > The common bits don't have support for cygwin/mingw32 DLLs. So just
> > removing this isn't right.
> >
> > > ! set lib_opts [list debug additional_flags=-qstatsym additional_flags=-qdbxextra]
> >
> > Remind me what this option means?
> >
> >
> Here is the next rev of the patch:
>
> 2005-04-19 Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
>
> * gdb.base/shreloc.exp: Change to use new shared library infrastructure
> and update copyright date.
The changelog doesn't mention the xlc changes; it should. The xlc
changes need comments explaining both what the options do, and (the bit
I haven't seen yet) why they are necessary for this test case. You
still removed the cygwin bits.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-27 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-13 17:14 Paul Gilliam
2005-04-14 19:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-15 19:41 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-04-20 0:31 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-04-27 15:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-04-29 23:15 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-04-30 9:06 ` Wu Zhou
2005-04-30 18:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-01 4:19 Wu Zhou
2005-05-01 4:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-01 4:36 Wu Zhou
2005-05-15 19:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-01 4:45 Wu Zhou
2005-05-09 6:28 Wu Zhou
2005-05-17 13:32 Wu Zhou
2005-05-17 14:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-17 15:15 Wu Zhou
2005-05-18 1:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-18 3:20 Wu Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050427155733.GB8399@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox