Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Eliminate deprecated_show_value_hack from remote.c
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050415101955.7bf2bf94@ironwood.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050415092223.007a21bf@ironwood.lan>

On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:22:23 -0700
Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:37:57 -0400
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 02:40:04PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> > > Here's an update to my recently posted patch.  The only difference
> > > between it and my earlier patch is the addition of the word "packet"
> > > to the message printed by show_remote_protocol_packet_cmd().
> > > 
> > > 	* remote.c (show_remote_protocol_packet_cmd): New function.
> > > 	(show_remote_protocol_vcont_packet_cmd )
> > > 	(show_remote_protocol_qSymbol_packet_cmd)
> > > 	(show_remote_protocol_P_packet_cmd)
> > > 	(show_remote_protocol_Z_software_bp_packet_cmd)
> > > 	(show_remote_protocol_Z_hardware_bp_packet_cmd)
> > > 	(show_remote_protocol_Z_write_wp_packet_cmd)
> > > 	(show_remote_protocol_Z_read_wp_packet_cmd)
> > > 	(show_remote_protocol_Z_access_wp_packet_cmd)
> > > 	(show_remote_protocol_binary_download_cmd)
> > > 	(show_remote_protocol_qPart_auxv_packet_cmd)
> > > 	(show_remote_protocol_p_packet_cmd ): Replace calls to
> > > 	deprecated_show_value_hack() and show_packet_config_cmd()
> > > 	with single call to show_remote_protocol_packet_cmd().
> > 
> > Do you want to go ahead with this patch, or just remove the double
> > printing as discussed on gdb@?
> 
> The latter.  I'll prepare a new patch today.

Done.  The patch which removes the printing of redundant information
may be found here:

    http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-04/msg00158.html

Since the new patch also eliminates the calls to
deprecated_show_value_hack(), the patches found in this thread (the
one I'm replying to) should be considered withdrawn.

Kevin


      reply	other threads:[~2005-04-15 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-06 20:55 Kevin Buettner
2005-04-06 20:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-06 21:40   ` Kevin Buettner
2005-04-14 19:38     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-15 16:22       ` Kevin Buettner
2005-04-15 17:20         ` Kevin Buettner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050415101955.7bf2bf94@ironwood.lan \
    --to=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox