From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes testsuit/gdb.base/annota1.exp
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050414193642.GB19792@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200504071025.11668.pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 09:25:11AM -0800, Paul Gilliam wrote:
> ping!
>
> This patch fixes a problem in annota1.exp
>
> First message in annota1.exp thread:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-09/msg00349.html
>
> Last message in in annota1.exp thread:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-09/msg00374.htm
>
> The annota1.exp patch was put on hold, waiting for a set backtrace patch.
>
> I submitted a set backtrace patch here:
>
> First message in set backtrace thread:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-10/msg00261.html
>
> last message in set backtrace thread:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-10/msg00443.html
>
> Then, like everyone else, I got involved in other things. But an
> internal bug system just reminded me these where still pending.
>
> Where do these patches sit now?
There are too many assorted attachments in those threads, some of which
are outdated. Could you repost, or at least post links to, any patch
that you specifically want reviewed?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-14 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-07 17:27 Paul Gilliam
2005-04-14 19:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-04-15 23:03 ` [PATCH] add new .exp file and a 'c' testfile to test backtrace limits etc Paul Gilliam
2005-04-30 18:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-28 23:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-15 23:38 ` [PATCH] Fixes testsuit/gdb.base/annota1.exp Paul Gilliam
2005-04-27 15:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-27 20:02 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-04-15 23:38 ` [PATCH] Fixes testsuit/gdb.base/annota1.exp to deal with 'Breakpoint address adjusted' Paul Gilliam
2005-04-27 15:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-27 21:47 ` [COMMIT] " Paul Gilliam
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-21 21:43 [PATCH] Fixes testsuit/gdb.base/annota1.exp Paul Gilliam
2004-09-22 14:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-22 16:56 ` Paul Gilliam
2004-09-22 19:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-23 2:13 ` Paul Gilliam
2004-09-23 17:08 ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-23 17:25 ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-23 17:25 ` Michael Chastain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050414193642.GB19792@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox