From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: pgilliam@us.ibm.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes testsuit/gdb.base/annota1.exp
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4151851B.1040100@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409211441.33901.pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
> On powerpc64--linux, annota1.exp has two problems:
>
> 1) A breakpoint in a shared object may be 'delayed'. This changes GDB's
> responce: both when the breakpoint is set and when it is hit.
I'm not sure what you mean. On i386 GNU/Linux, annota1.exp gets zero
fails so this would suggest some sort of ISA specific bug?
I see this lets GDB accept the ``warning: adjusting breakpoint''
message. I'm wondering if GDB should even emit the warning - it and the
descriptor are very much integral parts of the ABI - and hence should be
trying to always display the descriptor symbol and code address (and not
display the dot symbol).
What's going to happen when 64-bit PPC stops emiting those dot symbols?
> 2) Due to a bug (I which I knew the number), GDB 'skids' past the top-of-stack
> when doing a backtrace. This causes two extra and severial garbage stack
> frames to be displayed, eventually getting an error.
You mean backtracing past main - that code was recently rewritten.
However, there's apparently no test case for the feature, perhaphs it it
should first be added and fixed?. Anyway, I don't think we should be
passing a broken backtrace.
Andrew
> I have attached three patches: seperate patches for these two problems and one
> patch that fixes them both. I have also attached test logs so you can see
> what's up.
>
> Ok to commit? (which one(s)?)
>
> -=# Paul #=-
>
> PS: I thought the 'skidding past top-of-stack' problem was fixed. But it
> doesn't seem to be in cvs-main as of last week sometime.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-22 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-21 21:43 Paul Gilliam
2004-09-22 14:01 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-09-22 16:56 ` Paul Gilliam
2004-09-22 19:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-23 2:13 ` Paul Gilliam
2004-09-23 17:08 ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-23 17:25 ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-24 22:38 ` Test "set backtrace ..."; " Andrew Cagney
2004-09-23 17:25 ` Michael Chastain
2005-04-07 17:27 Paul Gilliam
2005-04-14 19:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-15 23:38 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-04-27 15:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-27 20:02 ` Paul Gilliam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4151851B.1040100@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
--cc=pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox