From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8500 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2005 19:36:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8467 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2005 19:36:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2005 19:36:42 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DMA8o-0005CW-2W; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:36:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Paul Gilliam Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes testsuit/gdb.base/annota1.exp Message-ID: <20050414193642.GB19792@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Gilliam , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200504071025.11668.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504071025.11668.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 09:25:11AM -0800, Paul Gilliam wrote: > ping! > > This patch fixes a problem in annota1.exp > > First message in annota1.exp thread: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-09/msg00349.html > > Last message in in annota1.exp thread: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-09/msg00374.htm > > The annota1.exp patch was put on hold, waiting for a set backtrace patch. > > I submitted a set backtrace patch here: > > First message in set backtrace thread: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-10/msg00261.html > > last message in set backtrace thread: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-10/msg00443.html > > Then, like everyone else, I got involved in other things. But an > internal bug system just reminded me these where still pending. > > Where do these patches sit now? There are too many assorted attachments in those threads, some of which are outdated. Could you repost, or at least post links to, any patch that you specifically want reviewed? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC