From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@buzzard.freeserve.co.uk>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA fix conversion of little-byte big-word floats to doublest
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 16:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041204160054.GA3130@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200412041546.iB4FkOnI002858@merlin.buzzard.freeserve.co.uk>
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 03:46:24PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 10:44:30 EST, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 02:38:00PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch fixes a bug in get_field which meant that we incorrectly
> > > converted mixed-endian floats (ARM FPA style) into the internal doublest
> > > format. This short change fixes over 300 testsuite failures in a combined
> > > arm/thumb testsuite run on arm-elf.
> > >
> > > * doublest.c (get_field): Correctly extract floatformat_littebyte_bigwo
> > rd
> > > fields.
> > >
> > > OK?
> >
> > Could you summarize for me how this is supposed to work? This means
> > that get_field treats littlebyte_bigword exactly the same as little.
> > There's another copy of get_field in libiberty (I don't know why there
> > are two) which treats it exactly the same as big, instead. I don't
> > know how that works either, but it seems the two ought to agree.
>
> The caller has pre-converted the word order into a pure little-endian
> format. See convert_format_to_doublest.
>
> Similar tricks are played on the reverse conversion.
Huh; it looks like the copy in libiberty is just broken for this case.
Is the code which does the swapping correct for the 96-bit format?
It converts ABCD EFGH IJKL to EFGH ABCD IJKL; I would have guessed that
pure little-endian representation would have been IJKL EFGH ABCD.
The swap-back code only swaps the first two words also.
Meanwhile, patch is OK; I'd appreciate it if you could add a comment in
get_field/put_field somewhere explaining what's going on.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-04 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-04 15:27 Richard Earnshaw
2004-12-04 15:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-04 16:01 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-12-04 16:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-12-04 17:23 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-12-04 17:33 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-12-04 19:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-05 1:51 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-12-05 15:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041204160054.GA3130@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@buzzard.freeserve.co.uk \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox