* [RFC] s/UINT_MAX/GDB_UINT_MAX/ ?
@ 2004-08-11 22:47 Joel Brobecker
2004-08-12 1:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-12 1:26 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2004-08-11 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
This is the last entity in config/powerpc/xm-aix4.h. The comment says:
/* UINT_MAX is defined in <sys/limits.h> as a decimal constant (4294967295)
which is too large to fit in a signed int when it is parsed by the
compiler, so it issues a diagnostic. Just undef it here so that we
use gdb's version in defs.h */
#undef UINT_MAX
So we have a collision between the macro defined by GDB and the macro
defined by the system. For recent enough versions of AIX, I don't think
the values are different, so we could look the other way and just remove
the #undef, and all things should work. But we still have this collision
and I think we should fix it.
So I suggest we do an all-source rename of UINT_MAX et al to GDB_UINT_MAX,
or something like this. Unless the collision was expected (ie we want to
pick the system value when defined)?
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] s/UINT_MAX/GDB_UINT_MAX/ ?
2004-08-11 22:47 [RFC] s/UINT_MAX/GDB_UINT_MAX/ ? Joel Brobecker
@ 2004-08-12 1:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-12 1:26 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-08-12 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 03:46:40PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> This is the last entity in config/powerpc/xm-aix4.h. The comment says:
>
> /* UINT_MAX is defined in <sys/limits.h> as a decimal constant (4294967295)
> which is too large to fit in a signed int when it is parsed by the
> compiler, so it issues a diagnostic. Just undef it here so that we
> use gdb's version in defs.h */
> #undef UINT_MAX
>
> So we have a collision between the macro defined by GDB and the macro
> defined by the system. For recent enough versions of AIX, I don't think
> the values are different, so we could look the other way and just remove
> the #undef, and all things should work. But we still have this collision
> and I think we should fix it.
>
> So I suggest we do an all-source rename of UINT_MAX et al to GDB_UINT_MAX,
> or something like this. Unless the collision was expected (ie we want to
> pick the system value when defined)?
The latter is correct. Take a look at the definition, in defs.h.
That's a buggy system... if you want to support it, we should detect it
in autoconf. Otherwise, I doubt we'll really miss the #undef.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] s/UINT_MAX/GDB_UINT_MAX/ ?
2004-08-11 22:47 [RFC] s/UINT_MAX/GDB_UINT_MAX/ ? Joel Brobecker
2004-08-12 1:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2004-08-12 1:26 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-08-12 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches
> This is the last entity in config/powerpc/xm-aix4.h. The comment says:
>
> /* UINT_MAX is defined in <sys/limits.h> as a decimal constant (4294967295)
> which is too large to fit in a signed int when it is parsed by the
> compiler, so it issues a diagnostic. Just undef it here so that we
> use gdb's version in defs.h */
> #undef UINT_MAX
>
> So we have a collision between the macro defined by GDB and the macro
> defined by the system. For recent enough versions of AIX, I don't think
> the values are different, so we could look the other way and just remove
> the #undef, and all things should work. But we still have this collision
> and I think we should fix it.
Lets drop the #undef. As you've indicated, recent versions of AIX don't
have this problem. If someone steps forward with a not-so-recent
version, they can fix configure.in.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-12 1:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-08-11 22:47 [RFC] s/UINT_MAX/GDB_UINT_MAX/ ? Joel Brobecker
2004-08-12 1:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-12 1:26 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox