Re: [patch/testsuite] Fix expected output for "help set follow-fork-mode"

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 01:35:39PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> There has been a recent change to infrun (made on 2004-01-13) that
> removed the choice "ask" to the possible values for "follow-fork-mode".
> The help text for that variable was then modified, but the test
> verifying that the help for this command exists has not been modified.
> 
> This patch updates the expected output to match the new help text.
> 
> 2004-04-04  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@gnat.com>
> 
>         * gdb.base/foll-fork.exp: Update the expected output for
>         "help set follow-fork-mode", to match a change that was made
>         to the help of this variable on 2004-01-13.
> 
> Checked in as obvious.

Thanks.  I keep meaning to fix up this test to run, when possible, on
GNU/Linux; but there's some trickiness involved and I've failed to do
it adequately a few times now.

> 
> I don't really know the purpose of this test. If, as the comment
> suggests:
> 
>         # Verify that help is available for "set follow-fork-mode".
> 
> Then I would recommend that we don't need to check for the entire
> help text word for word. I would simply check for the first line,
> or even maybe just check that we receive something, anything, before
> we get the prompt back.

I agree, personally.

> (BTW, Is it really necessary to use send_gdb + gdb_expect? Could gdb_test
> work just as well?)

Yes, feel free.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer