* Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: Handle pending breakpoint in shared library
@ 2004-03-11 1:55 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-23 23:06 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2004-03-11 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: drow, mec.gnu; +Cc: gdb-patches
drow> I'd rather not. You were happy with my last patch to add runto
drow> {allow-pending}, yes? I could just commit that.
I'm happy with your patch, but I haven't seen anything from
Fernando N or Mark S, and those are the only people who can
approve patches in testsuite/lib.
That's why I just capitulated and made gdb1250.exp look like
pending.exp and langs.exp.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: Handle pending breakpoint in shared library
@ 2004-03-19 0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-11 1:22 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-11 1:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2004-03-19 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Here is another attempt to fix gdb1250.exp so that it works with
the new 'pending breakpoint' feature.
I would like to get this fixed so that I can take it off my list
of regressions for binutils binutils-2_15-branch versus binutils 2.14.
Tested on: native i686-pc-linux-gnu, gcc 2.95.3 3.3.3 HEAD,
binutils 2.14 binutils-2_15-branch HEAD, dwarf-2 stabs+.
I'm not sure that "run" is the right command to issue to start
running the inferior. If it's not the right command, I would be
happy to change it.
Okay to commit?
Michael C
2004-03-10 Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
* gdb.base/gdb1250.exp: Accommodate a pending breakpoint in
a shared library.
Index: gdb1250.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/gdb1250.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -c -3 -p -r1.1 gdb1250.exp
*** gdb1250.exp 15 Jul 2003 16:28:21 -0000 1.1
--- gdb1250.exp 11 Mar 2004 01:17:07 -0000
***************
*** 1,4 ****
! # Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
--- 1,4 ----
! # Copyright 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
*************** gdb_start
*** 42,51 ****
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
gdb_load ${binfile}
! if ![runto abort] then {
! perror "couldn't run to breakpoint"
! continue
}
# See http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1250
#
--- 42,62 ----
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
gdb_load ${binfile}
! # Run on 'abort'. 'abort' is special because gcc knows that it is a
! # no-return function, so gcc does a special optimization in every
! # caller of 'abort'.
!
! set name "break abort"
! gdb_test_multiple "break abort" $name {
! -re "Function \"abort\" not defined\.\r\nMake breakpoint pending on future shared library load\\? \\(y or \\\[n\\\]\\) $" {
! gdb_test "y" "" $name
! }
! -re "Breakpoint $decimal at .*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
! pass $name
! }
}
+
+ gdb_test "run" "Breakpoint $decimal.*abort.*" "run to abort"
# See http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1250
#
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: Handle pending breakpoint in shared library
2004-03-19 0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
@ 2004-03-11 1:22 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-11 1:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2004-03-11 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Here is another attempt to fix gdb1250.exp so that it works with
the new 'pending breakpoint' feature.
I would like to get this fixed so that I can take it off my list
of regressions for binutils binutils-2_15-branch versus binutils 2.14.
Tested on: native i686-pc-linux-gnu, gcc 2.95.3 3.3.3 HEAD,
binutils 2.14 binutils-2_15-branch HEAD, dwarf-2 stabs+.
I'm not sure that "run" is the right command to issue to start
running the inferior. If it's not the right command, I would be
happy to change it.
Okay to commit?
Michael C
2004-03-10 Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
* gdb.base/gdb1250.exp: Accommodate a pending breakpoint in
a shared library.
Index: gdb1250.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/gdb1250.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -c -3 -p -r1.1 gdb1250.exp
*** gdb1250.exp 15 Jul 2003 16:28:21 -0000 1.1
--- gdb1250.exp 11 Mar 2004 01:17:07 -0000
***************
*** 1,4 ****
! # Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
--- 1,4 ----
! # Copyright 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
*************** gdb_start
*** 42,51 ****
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
gdb_load ${binfile}
! if ![runto abort] then {
! perror "couldn't run to breakpoint"
! continue
}
# See http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1250
#
--- 42,62 ----
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
gdb_load ${binfile}
! # Run on 'abort'. 'abort' is special because gcc knows that it is a
! # no-return function, so gcc does a special optimization in every
! # caller of 'abort'.
!
! set name "break abort"
! gdb_test_multiple "break abort" $name {
! -re "Function \"abort\" not defined\.\r\nMake breakpoint pending on future shared library load\\? \\(y or \\\[n\\\]\\) $" {
! gdb_test "y" "" $name
! }
! -re "Breakpoint $decimal at .*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
! pass $name
! }
}
+
+ gdb_test "run" "Breakpoint $decimal.*abort.*" "run to abort"
# See http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1250
#
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: Handle pending breakpoint in shared library
2004-03-19 0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-11 1:22 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
@ 2004-03-11 1:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-03-11 1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:22:36PM -0500, Michael Chastain wrote:
> Here is another attempt to fix gdb1250.exp so that it works with
> the new 'pending breakpoint' feature.
>
> I would like to get this fixed so that I can take it off my list
> of regressions for binutils binutils-2_15-branch versus binutils 2.14.
>
> Tested on: native i686-pc-linux-gnu, gcc 2.95.3 3.3.3 HEAD,
> binutils 2.14 binutils-2_15-branch HEAD, dwarf-2 stabs+.
>
> I'm not sure that "run" is the right command to issue to start
> running the inferior. If it's not the right command, I would be
> happy to change it.
>
> Okay to commit?
I'd rather not. You were happy with my last patch to add runto
{allow-pending}, yes? I could just commit that.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: Handle pending breakpoint in shared library
2004-03-11 1:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2004-03-19 0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-03-19 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:22:36PM -0500, Michael Chastain wrote:
> Here is another attempt to fix gdb1250.exp so that it works with
> the new 'pending breakpoint' feature.
>
> I would like to get this fixed so that I can take it off my list
> of regressions for binutils binutils-2_15-branch versus binutils 2.14.
>
> Tested on: native i686-pc-linux-gnu, gcc 2.95.3 3.3.3 HEAD,
> binutils 2.14 binutils-2_15-branch HEAD, dwarf-2 stabs+.
>
> I'm not sure that "run" is the right command to issue to start
> running the inferior. If it's not the right command, I would be
> happy to change it.
>
> Okay to commit?
I'd rather not. You were happy with my last patch to add runto
{allow-pending}, yes? I could just commit that.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: Handle pending breakpoint in shared library
@ 2004-03-24 18:25 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-24 18:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2004-03-24 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cagney, mec.gnu; +Cc: drow, gdb-patches
> Michael, can you commit "that"?
<busy signal>
I have my hands full with something else so I can't get to very much
gdb stuff before Friday evening.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: Handle pending breakpoint in shared library
2004-03-24 18:25 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
@ 2004-03-24 18:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-03-24 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 01:25:19PM -0500, Michael Chastain wrote:
> > Michael, can you commit "that"?
>
> <busy signal>
>
> I have my hands full with something else so I can't get to very much
> gdb stuff before Friday evening.
"that" was my patch anyway; I'll take care of it.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-24 18:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-11 1:55 [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: Handle pending breakpoint in shared library Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-23 23:06 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19 0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-11 1:22 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-11 1:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-24 18:25 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-24 18:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox