From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2735 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2004 01:55:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2724 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2004 01:55:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maynard.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.243) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2004 01:55:55 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B1FQK-0005VE-00; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:55:48 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 3E82B4B104; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:55:50 -0500 (EST) To: drow@false.org, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: Handle pending breakpoint in shared library Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040311015550.3E82B4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 01:55:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-03.o/txt/msg00263.txt drow> I'd rather not. You were happy with my last patch to add runto drow> {allow-pending}, yes? I could just commit that. I'm happy with your patch, but I haven't seen anything from Fernando N or Mark S, and those are the only people who can approve patches in testsuite/lib. That's why I just capitulated and made gdb1250.exp look like pending.exp and langs.exp. Michael C From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2735 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2004 01:55:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2724 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2004 01:55:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maynard.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.243) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2004 01:55:55 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B1FQK-0005VE-00; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:55:48 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 3E82B4B104; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:55:50 -0500 (EST) To: drow@false.org, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: Handle pending breakpoint in shared library Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <20040311015550.3E82B4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.Th8MUfrban7fKdaqIwSQioGmE9KmeUgUcuuhF2RICAs@z> drow> I'd rather not. You were happy with my last patch to add runto drow> {allow-pending}, yes? I could just commit that. I'm happy with your patch, but I haven't seen anything from Fernando N or Mark S, and those are the only people who can approve patches in testsuite/lib. That's why I just capitulated and made gdb1250.exp look like pending.exp and langs.exp. Michael C