Re: [PATCH] Remove some hardwired assumptions about register sets

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 02:28:02PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:51:10PM -0700, Fred Fish wrote:
> >
> >>On Tuesday 16 December 2003 23:14, Fred Fish wrote:
> >
> >>> This patch removes some hard coded assumptions about the sizes of the
> >>> various processor specific register sets, and also allows them to be
> >>> of different sizes if necessary.
> >>>
> >>> Comments?
> >
> >>
> >>Except for my own followup, there haven't been any comments about this
> >>patch.
> >>
> >>I propose that if there are no objections by this weekend that the
> >>patch should be checked in, after the previously noted fix is made of
> >>course.
> 
> >I like the patch, for what that's worth.
> 
> Daniel, the patch adds a global variable "num_mips_processor_regs" vis:
> !       tdep->mips_processor_reg_names = mips_irix_reg_names;
> !       num_mips_processor_regs = sizeof (mips_irix_reg_names) / sizeof 
> (char *);
> and that can't be right :-(

Good lord, I'm not paying enough attention.  I'm glad you caught that!

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer