Re: [rfa] add DMGL_PARAMS (was: new demangler)

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 08:54:57AM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:30:22 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:38:28PM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> 
> >> Okay; I'll just stick in the DMGL_PARAMS for now, then - my tests
> >> start passing again with that change.  (Or I could rewrite the code
> >> that parses the output to not look for parentheses, I suppose.)
> 
> > Do the former for now.
> 
> The latter actually should be easy enough given the parsing
> functionality that's already in cp-support.c, but I have no objection
> to the former, which I present here.  Is it okay for mainline?  Tested
> on i686-pc-linux-gnu, GCC 3.2, DWARF 2; no regressions.  (No tests,
> but it's necessary for my current patch awaiting approval to work
> properly.)
> 
> David Carlton
> carlton@kealia.com
> 
> 2003-12-16  David Carlton  <carlton@kealia.com>
> 
> 	* cp-support.c (class_name_from_physname): Add DMGL_PARAMS.
> 	(method_name_from_physname): Ditto.

Yes, this is fine.  Thanks!

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer