From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-29365-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 5363 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2003 19:23:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 5327 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2003 19:23:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2003 19:23:07 -0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AWKmh-00022U-Fh
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:23:07 -0500
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:23:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa] add DMGL_PARAMS (was: new demangler)
Message-ID: <20031216192307.GA7798@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
References: <yf2he01vg6z.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com> <m3y8tdfzir.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <yf2d6apvfg2.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com> <m3u141fz28.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <m3ptepfyxh.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <yf28yldvevq.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com> <m3he01fygc.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <yf23cblveh7.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com> <20031216053022.GA28127@nevyn.them.org> <yf2he00u2hq.fsf_-_@hawaii.kealia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <yf2he00u2hq.fsf_-_@hawaii.kealia.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00394.txt.bz2

On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 08:54:57AM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:30:22 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:38:28PM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> 
> >> Okay; I'll just stick in the DMGL_PARAMS for now, then - my tests
> >> start passing again with that change.  (Or I could rewrite the code
> >> that parses the output to not look for parentheses, I suppose.)
> 
> > Do the former for now.
> 
> The latter actually should be easy enough given the parsing
> functionality that's already in cp-support.c, but I have no objection
> to the former, which I present here.  Is it okay for mainline?  Tested
> on i686-pc-linux-gnu, GCC 3.2, DWARF 2; no regressions.  (No tests,
> but it's necessary for my current patch awaiting approval to work
> properly.)
> 
> David Carlton
> carlton@kealia.com
> 
> 2003-12-16  David Carlton  <carlton@kealia.com>
> 
> 	* cp-support.c (class_name_from_physname): Add DMGL_PARAMS.
> 	(method_name_from_physname): Ditto.

Yes, this is fine.  Thanks!

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer