From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: SH patch 2 (was Re: [RFA] SH: Deprecate deprecated functions, use new frame interface)
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030924084311.GF9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16240.44135.87461.106684@localhost.redhat.com>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:26:15PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > I don't think that's necessary. The results with dwarf2 unwinding are
> > 1 FAIL less than without dwarf2 unwinding. Removing the dwarf2
> > unwinding might result in forgetting it. Keeping it in will remind us
> > that the dwarf2 unwinder still needs a bit of work.
>
> I think so too. But I'd like to see if something can be done for SH
> similar to the i386_convert_register_p method.
Is that necessary before the patch gets approval or could that be added
in a follow up step?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Developer
Red Hat, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-24 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-08 16:55 [RFA] SH: Deprecate deprecated functions, use new frame interface Corinna Vinschen
2003-09-12 17:32 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-09-15 15:53 ` SH patch 1 (was Re: [RFA] SH: Deprecate deprecated functions, use new frame interface) Corinna Vinschen
2003-09-16 15:42 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-09-16 15:57 ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-09-15 16:01 ` SH patch 2 " Corinna Vinschen
2003-09-16 17:06 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-09-16 17:26 ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-09-16 17:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-16 17:58 ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-09-22 14:33 ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-09-22 14:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-22 15:08 ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-09-23 20:16 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-09-24 8:43 ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]
2003-09-24 11:28 ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-09-25 19:44 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-09-26 11:32 ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-09-24 18:12 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-09-25 8:56 ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-09-22 16:27 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030924084311.GF9981@cygbert.vinschen.de \
--to=vinschen@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox